Davos Oblivious to One of Free Trade’s Gravest Threats
Danny Lam, 26 Jan 18

U.S. Navy ships operate in formation in the South China Sea. (U.S. Navy)

Every day, tens of millions of people and trillions of dollars of goods and services flow across routes known as global commons — aboard ships, underwater, by air and in space.

No country exercises sovereignty over most of these global commons routes, and yet everyone abides by the rules.

That means there’s little need for self-protection or armed escorts against pirates or privateers and no one has to pay protection money to warlords en route.

It was not always this way. As recently as the mid-19th century, high-value cargo on the High Seas was transported by heavily armed merchant ships like East Indiaman. On land, many routes required travellers to be armed and protected from bandits or highwaymen. Taxes were routinely paid to warlords or local chiefs for safe passage.

The communist regime of China, however, has staked a sovereign claim to most of the South China Sea, where there was $3.4 trillion in trade transit in 2016. If allowed to stand, this will enable China to ban or embargo shipping, or to levy fees for passage like 19th-century potentates.

Yet power brokers meeting in Davos this week are barely acknowledging this grave threat to free trade.

Ottoman Empire amassed wealth

Prior to Pax Britannica, a period of relative peace in Europe from 1815 to 1914, the cost of tariffs and other protectionist measures paled in comparison to the cost of privately protecting and insuring commerce or paying tariffs levied by kingdoms en route.

For example, the Ottoman Empire became wealthy by monopolizing and controlling the overland trade route between Europe and India and levying taxes on the spice trade.

The Portuguese monopolized the sea route to Cathay before their hold was broken by the Dutch and English.

Indeed, centuries of European innovation centred around either gaining control of, or bypassing, existing trade routes to avoid these levies.

Those acting on behalf of potentates routinely preyed upon insufficiently-armed merchants and seized their cargo and crew for ransom unless they were under the protection of another empire.

Piracy eventually curbed

The U.S. Navy, in fact, was expressly created in 1794 because North African Barbary pirates seized and ransomed American ships and crews after the British Royal Navy stopped protecting the U.S. following the War of Independence.

In this oil painting from the 1600s by Dutch marine painter Aert Anthoniszoon, a French ship is seen being bombarded by Barbary Pirates. (Creative Commons)

Aggressive enforcement of “freedom of navigation” eventually curbed piracy, first on British routes and then on all western shipping routes via reciprocal agreements with other imperial powers.

After Lord Nelson’s victory at Trafalgar and during the Napoleonic Wars, the Royal Navy provided protection of commerce and merchant shipping, making free trade possible with security provided as a public good.

As transportation costs fell, trade, especially within the British Empire, flourished.

By the 20th century, a global system emerged where imperial powers guarded trade routes and offered assistance to each other on a reciprocal basis. Tariffs, or “protection fees” levied en route by potentates, were largely abolished — by force when necessary — except for the use of purpose-built infrastructure like the Suez and Panama canals.

Freedom of navigation expands

The golden age of free trade ushered in after the First World War owes its success to Pax Americana, a period of relative peace in the Western Hemisphere around the middle of the 20th century. It took over from the British model and expanded freedom of navigation worldwide. Allied naval power underwrote free trade by providing protection.

Freedom of navigation is about limiting and regulating states’ ability to assert sovereignty at sea and use it to tax, regulate, embargo or blockade commerce in peacetime. In exchange for ceding those rights, states gained access to global commons from other states on a reciprocal basis.

States also assumed the responsibility to protect and respect shipping and provide security for trade routes without charge, though this remained, to this day, the responsibility of wealthier and more capable states.

These rules and practices were modernized and codified in the United Nations Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) convention in 1982 that defined rules on what are territorial waters, exclusive economic zones and rights of vessels in peacetime for innocent passage and transit.

States that signed and ratified UNCLOS agreed to a set of rules that facilitated navigation and trade. Historical or prior claims that states may have had to territorial waters beyond UNCLOS were extinguished after it came into force in 1994.

Most countries, including China, signed and ratified UNCLOS. The United States signed but did not ratify, though it voluntarily abides by most of its provisions.

Sign in to view full article

You Too Could Be Multilingual – It’s Just About Unlocking The Skills Inside
Think back to when you first started learning a foreign language. For many readers it was probably French, German or ...
Christopher Timothy McGuirk
Thu, 6 Apr 17
Our Experiments Taught Us Why People Troll
“Fail at life. Go bomb yourself.”
Justin Cheng, Michael Bernstein, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
Mon, 6 Mar 17
The Science of Gossip: Four Ways to Make it Less Toxic
Gossip gets a bad rap. There’s no doubt that the act of gossiping about someone can sometimes be damaging and ...
Jenny Cole
Sat, 1 Apr 17
How Gaming in The Classroom Prepares Children for Life in A Surveillance State
It’s well known that surveillance effects how we behave. A recent study on the issue showed that traffic to Wikipedia ...
Laura R. Pinkerton
Wed, 17 May 17
Is Violent Political Protest Ever Justified?
The mass protests against Donald Trump’s election, inauguration, and executive actions might subside – but based on the scale and ...
Christopher J. Finlay
Thu, 30 Mar 17
Sports Elements
An Epoch Times Survey
An Epoch Times Survey
Sports Elements
Sports Elements